4.7 Article

Simulation and experimental studies of corona power loss in a dust loaded wire-duct electrostatic precipitator

Journal

ADVANCED POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 706-714

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2010.10.005

Keywords

Electrostatics; Precipitators; Fly ash; Finite element; Method of characteristics corona

Funding

  1. King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals [SB 08-019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates numerically and experimentally the performance of a single stage wire-duct electrostatic precipitators (WDEP) as influenced by different geometrical and operating parameters. To numerically solve the governing equations, namely Poisson's and the current continuity equations, the finite element method (FEM) and a modified method of characteristics (MMC) were used. One major advantage of the present work over those reported in the literature is that the characteristic lines follow the FE grid pattern which results in fast convergence and reduction of the computational time. To verify the results experimentally, a proto-type WDEP was successfully designed and fabricated at the research institute of KFUPM (RI-KFUPM). The experiments were carried out under laboratory conditions and a smoke of fired coal was used as a source of seed particles of PM10 category (around 78% of particles lying below 10 mu m). The results show how different parameters (such as discharging wire radii's, wire-to-wire spacing and wire-to-plate spacing as well as the fly ash flow speed and applied voltage polarity) influenced the corona power loss and current density profiles. An indication of the effectiveness of this approach was carried out through a comparison of previously computed results and previously as well presently obtained experimental data. (C) 2010 The Society of Powder Technology Japan. Published by Elsevier B.V. and The Society of Powder Technology Japan. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available