4.8 Review

2D Oxide Nanomaterials to Address the Energy Transition and Catalysis

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201801712

Keywords

2D catalysts; 2D zeolites; energy transitions; environmentally friendly catalysis; layered oxides

Funding

  1. PRIN 2015 SMARTNESS project [2015K7FZLH]
  2. Charles University Centre of Advanced Materials (CUCAM) (OP VVV Excellent Research Teams) [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000417]
  3. Czech Science Foundation [P106/12/G015]
  4. Primus Research Program of the Charles University [PRIMUS/17/SCI/22]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

2D oxide nanomaterials constitute a broad range of materials, with a wide array of current and potential applications, particularly in the fields of energy storage and catalysis for sustainable energy production. Despite the many similarities in structure, composition, and synthetic methods and uses, the current literature on layered oxides is diverse and disconnected. A number of reviews can be found in the literature, but they are mostly focused on one of the particular subclasses of 2D oxides. This review attempts to bridge the knowledge gap between individual layered oxide types by summarizing recent developments in all important 2D oxide systems including supported ultrathin oxide films, layered clays and double hydroxides, layered perovskites, and novel 2D-zeolite-based materials. Particular attention is paid to the underlying similarities and differences between the various materials, and the subsequent challenges faced by each research community. The potential of layered oxides toward future applications is critically evaluated, especially in the areas of electrocatalysis and photocatalysis, biomass conversion, and fine chemical synthesis. Attention is also paid to corresponding novel 3D materials that can be obtained via sophisticated engineering of 2D oxides.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available