4.8 Article

Snowing Graphene using Microwave Ovens

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 30, Issue 40, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201803189

Keywords

corona discharge; macroscopic architectures; snowing graphene; strain sensors

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFA0200101, 2016YFA0200104]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51432002, 51720105003, 21790052]
  3. Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Project [Z161100002116026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Developing a simple and industrially scalable method to produce graphene with high quality and low cost will determine graphene's future. The two conventional approaches, chemical vapor deposition and liquid-phase exfoliation, require either costly substrates with limited production rate or complicated post treatment with limited quality, astricting their development. Herein, an extremely simple process is presented for synthesizing high quality graphene at low-cost in the gas phase, similar to snowing, which is catalyst-free, substrate-free, and scalable. This is achieved by utilizing corona discharge of SiO2/Si in an ordinary household microwave oven at ambient pressure. High quality graphene flakes can snow on any substrate, with thin-flakes even down to the monolayer. In particular, a high yield of approximate to 6.28% or a rate of up to approximate to 0.11 g h(-1) can be achieved in a conventional microwave oven. It is demonstrated that the snowing process produces foam-like, fluffy, 3D macroscopic architectures, which are further used in strain sensors for achieving high sensitivity (average gauge factor approximate to 171.06) and large workable strain range (0%-110%) simultaneously. It is foreseen that this facile and scalable strategy can be extended for snowing other functional 2D materials, benefiting their low-cost production and wide applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available