4.8 Article

Hydrogels and Scaffolds for Immunomodulation

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 26, Issue 38, Pages 6530-6541

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201402105

Keywords

immunology; hydrogels; biomaterials; scaffolds; immunomodulation; polymers

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [1R21 CA185236-01, EB 1R01-000346-21]
  2. Cornell University-Ithaca
  3. Weill Cornell Medical College
  4. National Science Foundation
  5. Melinda and Bill Gates Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For over two decades, immunologists and biomaterials scientists have co-existed in parallel world with the rationale of understanding the molecular profile of immune responses to vaccination, implantation, and treating incurable diseases. Much of the field of biomaterial-based immunotherapy has relied on evaluating model antigens such as chicken egg ovalbumin in mouse models but their relevance to humans has been point of much discussion. Nevertheless, such model antigens have provided important insights into the mechanisms of immune regulation and served as a proof-of-concept for plethora of biomaterial-based vaccines. After years of extensive development of numerous biomaterials for immunomodulation, it is only recently that an experimental scaffold vaccine implanted beneath the skin has begun to use the human model to study the immune responses to cancer vaccination by co-delivering patient-derived tumor lysates and immunomodulatory proteins. If successful, this scaffold vaccine will change the way we approached untreatable cancers, but more importantly, will allow a faster and more rational translation of therapeutic regimes to other cancers, chronic infections, and autoimmune diseases. Most materials reviews have focused on immunomodulatory adjuvants and micro-nano-particles. Here we provide an insight into emerging hydrogel and scaffold based immunomodulatory approaches that continue to demonstrate efficacy against immune associated diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available