4.8 Review

Carbon Materials for Chemical Capacitive Energy Storage

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 23, Issue 42, Pages 4828-4850

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201100984

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF of China [20871030]
  2. State Key Basic Research Program of PRC [2009AA033701, 2011CB933302]
  3. Delta Environmental & Educational Foundation (Taiwan)
  4. U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)
  5. Fluid Interface Reactions, Structures and Transport (FIRST) Center
  6. Energy Frontier Research Center
  7. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [ERKCC61]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon materials have attracted intense interests as electrode materials for electrochemical capacitors, because of their high surface area, electrical conductivity, chemical stability and low cost. Activated carbons produced by different activation processes from various precursors are the most widely used electrodes. Recently, with the rapid growth of nanotechnology, nanostructured electrode materials, such as carbon nanotubes and template-synthesized porous carbons have been developed. Their unique electrical properties and well controlled pore sizes and structures facilitate fast ion and electron transportation. In order to further improve the power and energy densities of the capacitors, carbon-based composites combining electrical double layer capacitors (EDLC)-capacitance and pseudo-capacitance have been explored. They show not only enhanced capacitance, but as well good cyclability. In this review, recent progresses on carbon-based electrode materials are summarized, including activated carbons, carbon nanotubes, and template-synthesized porous carbons, in particular mesoporous carbons. Their advantages and disadvantages as electrochemical capacitors are discussed. At the end of this review, the future trends of electrochemical capacitors with high energy and power are proposed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available