4.8 Article

Solution-Processable Reduced Graphene Oxide as a Novel Alternative to PEDOT:PSS Hole Transport Layers for Highly Efficient and Stable Polymer Solar Cells

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 23, Issue 42, Pages 4923-4928

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201102207

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) Institutional Program
  2. Ministry of Knowledge Economy (MKE) [2010-H-003-00030100-2010]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  4. Korea government (MEST) [2010-0029212]
  5. Bio Imaging Research Center at GIST
  6. Ministry of Education, Science & Technology (MoST), Republic of Korea [gist-12] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  7. Ministry of Science & ICT (MSIT), Republic of Korea [GIST-12] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  8. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [2Z0345] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  9. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0029212] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The preparation of a reduced graphene oxide (pr-Go) is with a novel p-TosNHNH2 reductant is demonstrated for use as an efficient anode interfacial layer for high-performance and highstability organic solar cells (OSCs). The efficiency of the cells with pr-GO is highly comparable to those of the PEDOT:PSSbased devices. Furthermore, the pr-GO based OSCs show a much longer cell life time in air stability tests in comparison with PEDOT:PSS-based cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available