Journal
OTJR-OCCUPATION PARTICIPATION AND HEALTH
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 78-86Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.3928/15394492-20100325-03
Keywords
parenting; occupation; qualitative methods
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study examines how meanings of caregiving occupations differ between caregivers of children with disabilities with high versus low self-rated psychological well-being. Thirty-nine caregivers completed in-depth interviews about their caregiving and Psychological Well-being Scales. A non parametric test confirmed that differences in well-being were not associated with income, education, or depressive symptoms. The qualitative analysis revealed one global meaning dimension for caregiving (broadening of self, family, and world) and five situational level meaning dimensions of caregiving (intensity of caregiving, diminished personal control, perspective on caregiving demands, depth of conviction about the value of this life course, and present dwelling). For the global meaning and one dimension (broadening of self and personal control), triangulation between a relevant scale and the qualitatively generated dimension confirmed qualitative findings of differences between the high and low well-being groups. Findings suggest that 75% of caregivers describe frequently challenging caregiving demands. Those with self-rated high well-being construct a more positive view of the meaning of this experience that bolsters their capacity to engage in caregiving work.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available