Journal
JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH
Volume 54, Issue -, Pages 58-65Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01238.x
Keywords
authority; dehumanisation; expert; knowledge; moral responsibility; philosopher
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This article poses the question, 'Who is the expert?' in relation to people with intellectual disabilities. It begins with an exploration of what it means to assert moral authority in relation to people with IDs, and makes the argument that 'experts' who draw moral boundaries, define conceptions of the 'good' and quality of life for people must consider how to occupy this position responsibly. It then considers a second form of authority - epistemic authority - and explores the moral responsibility that accompanies the practice of putting forth knowledge claims about ID. This involves acknowledging three potential problems: distancing, oppression and dehumanization. The article concludes with questions that point towards greater interdisciplinary dialogue regarding authority, responsibility and the role of the expert.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available