4.8 Article

Single Ho3+-Doped Upconversion Nanoparticles for High-Performance T2-Weighted Brain Tumor Diagnosis and MR/UCL/CT Multimodal Imaging

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 24, Issue 42, Pages 6613-6620

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201401609

Keywords

upconversion nanoparticles; Holmium; MRI; fluorescence quenching; brain tumors

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51372260, 51132009, 21172043, 51102259]
  2. Shanghai Rising-Star Program [12QH1402500]
  3. Nano special program of the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai [11nm0505000]
  4. Development Foundation for Talents of Shanghai [2012035]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multimodal bio-imaging has attracted great attention for early and accurate diagnosis of tumors, which, however, suffers from the intractable issues such as complicated multi-step syntheses for composite nanostructures and interferences among different modalities like fluorescence quenching by MRI contrast agents (e.g., magnetic iron oxide NPs). Herein, the first example of T-2-weighted MR imaging of Ho3+-doped upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) is presented, which, very attractively, could also be simultaneously used for upconversion luminesence (UCL) and CT imaging, thus enabling high performance multi-modal MRI/UCL/CT imagings in single UCNPs. The new finding of T-2-MRI contrast enhancement by integrated sensitizer (Yb3+) and activator (Ho3+) in UCNPs favors accurate MR diagnosis of brain tumor and provides a new strategy for acquiring T-2-MRI/optical imaging without fluorescence quenching. Unlike other multi-phased composite nanostructures for multimodality imaging, this Ho3+-doped UCNPs are featured with simplicity of synthesis and highly efficient multimodal MRI/UCL/CT imaging without fluorescence quenching, thus simplify nanostructure and probe preparation and enable win-win multimodality imaging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available