4.8 Article

Composite Living Fibers for Creating Tissue Constructs Using Textile Techniques

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 24, Issue 26, Pages 4060-4067

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201303655

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSERC
  2. CIHR
  3. CHRP
  4. CFI
  5. Genome Canada
  6. Genome Quebec
  7. Canada Research Chair
  8. National Science Foundation CAREER Award [DMR 0847287]
  9. office of Naval Research Young National Investigator Award
  10. National Institutes of Health [HL092836, DE019024, EB012597, AR057837, DE021468, HL099073, EB008392]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fabrication of cell-laden structures with anisotropic mechanical properties while having a precise control over the distribution of different cell types within the constructs is important for many tissue engineering applications. Automated textile technologies for making fabrics allow simultaneous control over the color pattern and directional mechanical properties. The use of textile techniques in tissue engineering, however, demands the presence of cell-laden fibers that can withstand the mechanical stresses during the assembly process. Here, the concept of composite living fibers (CLFs) in which a core of load bearing synthetic polymer is coated by a hydrogel layer containing cells or microparticles is introduced. The core thread is drawn sequentially through reservoirs containing a cell-laden prepolymer and a crosslinking reagent. The thickness of the hydrogel layer increases linearly with to the drawing speed and the prepolymer viscosity. CLFs are fabricated and assembled using regular textile processes including weaving, knitting, braiding, winding, and embroidering, to form cell-laden structures. Cellular viability and metabolic activity are preserved during CLF fabrication and assembly, demonstrating the feasibility of using these processes for engineering functional 3D tissue constructs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available