4.8 Article

Organic Light-Emitting Diodes with 30% External Quantum Efficiency Based on a Horizontally Oriented Emitter

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 23, Issue 31, Pages 3896-3900

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201300104

Keywords

organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs); transition dipole moment; exciplex forming hosts; phosphorescent dyes

Funding

  1. industrial strategic technology development program [10035225]
  2. MKE/KEIT of Korea
  3. Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD)
  4. Bayerische Forschungsstiftung (BFS)
  5. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10035225] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-efficiency phosphorescent organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) doped with Ir(ppy)(2)(acac) [bis(2-phenylpyridine)iridium(III)-acetylacetonate] in an exciplex forming co-host have been optically analyzed. This emitter has a preferred orientation with the horizontal to vertical dipole ratio of 0.77:0.23 as compared to 0.67:0.33 in the isotropic case. Theoretical analysis based on the orientation factor (, the ratio of the horizontal dipoles to total dipoles) and the photoluminescence quantum yield (q(PL)) of the emitter predicts that the maximum external quantum efficiency (EQE) of the OLEDs with this emitter is about 30%, which matches very well with the experimental data, indicating that the electrical loss of the OLEDs is negligible and the device structure can be utilized as a platform to demonstrate the validity of optical modeling. Based on the results, the maximum EQE achievable for a certain emitting dye in a host can be predicted by just measuring q(PL) and in a neat film on glass without the need to fabricate devices, which offers a universal plot of the maximum EQE as a function of q(PL) and .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available