4.8 Article

Osteoconductive Performance of Carbon Nanotube Scaffolds Homogeneously Mineralized by Flow-Through Electrodeposition

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 22, Issue 21, Pages 4411-4420

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201200684

Keywords

biomaterials; electrodeposition; flow-through; mineralization; osteoconductive; 3D scaffolds

Funding

  1. MINECO [MAT2009-10214, MAT2011-25329]
  2. European Union [263289]
  3. CSIC
  4. MINECO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The treatment of bone lesions, including fractures, tumor resection and osteoporosis, is a common clinical practice where bone healing and repair are pursued. It is widely accepted that calcium phosphate-based materials improve integration of biomaterials with surrounding bone tissue and further serve as a template for proper function of bone-forming cells. Within this context, mineralization on preformed substrates appears as an interesting and successful alternative for mineral surface functionalization. However, mineralization of true 3D scaffolds in which the magnitude of the third dimension is within the same scale as the other two is by no means a trivial issue because of the difficulty to obtain a homogeneous mineral layer deposited on the entire internal surface of the scaffold. Herein, a flow-through electrodeposition process is applied for mineralization of 3D scaffolds composed of multiwall carbon nanotubes and chitosan. It is demonstrated that, irrespective of the experimental conditions used for electrodeposition (e.g., time, temperature and voltages), the continuous feed of salts provided by the use of a flow-through configuration is the main issue if one desires to coat the entire internal structure of 3D scaffolds with a homogeneous mineral layer. Finally, mineralized scaffolds not only showed a remarkable biocompatibility when tested with human osteoblast cells, but also enhanced osteoblast terminal differentiation (as early as 7 days in calcifying media).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available