4.8 Article

Photoconductivity of C60 as an Origin of Bias-Dependent Photocurrent in Organic Photovoltaics

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 22, Issue 14, Pages 3089-3094

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201200069

Keywords

bias-dependent photocurrent; charge collection efficiency; photoconductivity; planar heterojunction solar cells; organic solar cells

Funding

  1. Ministry of Knowledge Economy [20093020010040]
  2. Korea Research Foundation NCRC [R15-2008-006-01001-1]
  3. WCU (World Class University) through the National Research Foundation of Korea
  4. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [R31-2008-000-10075-0]
  5. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20093020010040] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [R31-2012-000-10075-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The bulk-ionized photoconductivity of C60 is reported as an origin of the bias-dependent linear change of the photocurrent in copper phthalocyanine (CuPc)/C60 planar heterojunction solar cells, based on the observation of the variation of the bias-dependent photocurrent on excitation wavelengths and the thickness-dependent photocurrent of the C60 layer. A theoretical model, which is a combination of the Braun-Onsager model for the dissociation of excitons at the donor/acceptor interface and the Onsager model for the bulk ionization of excitons in the C60 layer, describes the bias-dependent photocurrent in the devices very well. The bulk-ionized photoconductivity of C60 must generally contribute to the photocurrent in organic photovoltaics, since fullerene and fullerene derivatives are widely used in these devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available