4.8 Article

Pore Filling of Spiro-OMeTAD in Solid-State Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Determined Via Optical Reflectometry

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 22, Issue 23, Pages 5010-5019

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201201223

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/F065884/1]
  2. European Community [246124]
  3. EPSRC [EP/F065884/1, EP/G049653/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F065884/1, EP/G049653/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simple strategy is presented to determine the pore-filling fraction of the hole-conductor 2,2-7,7-tetrakis-N,N-di-pmethoxyphenylamine-9,9-spirobifluorene (spiro-OMeTAD) into mesoporous photoanodes in solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells (ss-DSCs). Based on refractive index determination by the film's reflectance spectra and using effective medium approximations the volume fractions of the constituent materials can be extracted, hence the pore-filling fraction quantified. This non-destructive method can be used with complete films and does not require detailed model assumptions. Pore-filling fractions of up to 80% are estimated for optimized solid-state DSC photoanodes, which is higher than that previously estimated by indirect methods. Additionally, transport and recombination lifetimes as a function of the pore-filling fraction are determined using photovoltage and photocurrent decay measurements. While extended electron lifetimes are observed with increasing pore-filling fractions, no trend is found in the transport kinetics. The data suggest that a pore-filling fraction of greater than 60% is necessary to achieve optimized performance in ss-DSCs. This degree of pore-filling is even achieved in 5 mu m thick mesoporous photoanodes. It is concluded that pore-filling is not a limiting factor in the fabrication of thick ss-DSCs with spiro-OMeTAD as the hole-conductor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available