4.8 Article

Enhanced Relaxometric Properties of MRI Positive Contrast Agents Confined in Three-Dimensional Cubic Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 21, Issue 24, Pages 4653-4662

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201101766

Keywords

mesoporous silica nanospheres; MCM-48; MRI; positive contrast agents; gadolinium

Funding

  1. National Science and Engineering Research Council (Canada)
  2. Canadian Foundation for Innovation
  3. Fonds quebecois de la recherche sur la nature et les technologies (Quebec)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) are of growing interest for the development of novel probes enabling efficient tracking of cells in vivo using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The incorporation of Gd3+ paramagnetic ions into highly porous MSNs is a powerful strategy to synthesize positive MRI contrast agents for more quantitative T1-weighted MR imaging. Within this context, different strategies have been reported to integrate Gd chelates to 2D pore network MSNs. As an alternative, we report on the modulation of the pore network topology through the preparation of a 3D pore network hybrid GdSixOy MSN system. In this study, 2D GdSixOy-MSNs with similar porosity and particle size were also prepared and the relaxometric performances of both materials, directly compared. Both syntheses lead to water-dispersible MSNs suspensions (particle size < 200 nm), which were stable for at least 48h. 3D GdSixOy-MSNs provided a significant increase in 1H longitudinal relaxivity (18.5 s-1mM-1; 4.6 times higher than Gd-DTPA) and low r2/r1 ratios (1.56) compatible with the requirements of positive contrast agents for MRI. These results demonstrate the superiority of a 3D pore network to host paramagnetic atoms for MRI signal enhancement using T1-weighted imaging. Such an approach minimizes the total amount of paramagnetic element per particle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available