4.8 Article

Signal-On Electrochemiluminescence Biosensors Based on CdS-Carbon Nanotube Nanocomposite for the Sensitive Detection of Choline and Acetylcholine

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages 1444-1450

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.200801313

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20890020, 20675037, 20775033]
  2. National Natural Science Funds for Creative Research Groups [20821063]
  3. 973 Program [2007CB936404, 2006CB933201]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work describes for the first time signal-on electrochemiluminescence (ECL) enzyme biosensors based on cadmium sulfide nanocrystals (CdS NCs) formed in situ on the surface of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). The MWCNT-CdS can react with H2O2 to generate strong and stavke ECL emission in neutral solution. Compared with pure CdS NCs, the MWCNT-CdS can enhance the ECL intensity by 5.3-fold and move the onset ECL potential more positively for about 400 mV, which reduces H2O2 decomposition at the electrode surface and increases detection sensitivity of H2O2. Furthermore, the ECL intensity is less influenced by the presence of oxygen in solution. Benefiting from these properties, signal-on enzyme-based biosensors are fabricated by cross-linking choline oxidase and/or acetylcholine esterase with glutaraldehyde on MWCNT-CdS modified electrodes for detection of choline and acetylcholine. The resulting ECL biosensors show wide linear ranges from 1.7 to 332 mu m and 3.3 to 216 mu m with lower detection limit of 0.8 and 1.7 mu m for choline and acetylcholine respectively. The common interferents such as ascorbic acid and uric acid in electrochemical enzyme-based biosensors do not interfere with the ECL detection of choline and acetylcholine. Furthermore, both ECL biosensors possess satisfying reproducibility and acceptable stability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available