4.8 Review

'Mechanical Engineering' of Elastomeric Proteins: Toward Designing New Protein Building Blocks for Biomaterials

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 18, Issue 18, Pages 2643-2657

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.200800480

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canada Research Chairs Program
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  5. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research
  6. University of British Columbia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Elastomeric proteins are subject to stretching force under biological settings and play important roles in regulating the mechanical properties of a wide range of biological machinery. Elastomeric proteins also underlie the superb mechanical properties of many protein-based biomaterials. The developments of single molecule force spectroscopy have enabled the direct characterization of the mechanical properties of elastomeric proteins at the single molecule level and led to the new burgeoning field of research: single protein mechanics-and engineering. Combined, single molecule atomic force microscopy and protein engineering efforts are well under way to understand molecular determinants for the mechanical stability of elastomeric proteins and to develop methodologies to tune the mechanical properties of proteins in a rational and systematic fashion, which will lead to the 'mechanical engineering' of elastomeric proteins. Here the current status of these experimental efforts is discussed and the successes and challenges in constructing novel proteins with tailored nanomechanical proteins are highlighted. The prospect of employing such engineered artificial elastomeric proteins as building blocks for the construction of biomaterials for applications ranging from material sciences to biomedical engineering is also discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available