4.7 Review

Miniaturized pre-clinical cancer models as research and diagnostic tools

Journal

ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS
Volume 69, Issue -, Pages 52-66

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2013.11.010

Keywords

Microfluidics; Cancer models; Pre-clinical drug assessment; Cell culturing devices; Extracellular matrix; Microfabricated model systems; Tumor microenvironment; Cell adhesion-mediated drug resistance; Combinatorial screening platforms; Body-on-a-chip

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science foundation (SNF) [PA00P3_142120/1]
  2. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
  3. NCI/NIH [CA113451, CA06927]
  4. Swiss Competence Center for Materials Science and Technology (CCMX)
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PA00P3_142120] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cancer is one of the most common causes of death worldwide. Consequently, important resources are directed towards bettering treatments and outcomes. Cancer is difficult to treat due to its heterogeneity, plasticity and frequent drug resistance. New treatment strategies should strive for personalized approaches. These should target neoplastic and/or activated microenvironmental heterogeneity and plasticity without triggering resistance and spare host cells. In this review, the putative use of increasingly physiologically relevant microfabricated cell-culturing systems intended for drug development is discussed. There are two main reasons for the use of miniaturized systems. First, scaling down model size allows for high control of microenvironmental cues enabling more predictive outcomes. Second, miniaturization reduces reagent consumption, thus facilitating combinatorial approaches with little effort and enables the application of scarce materials, such as patient-derived samples. This review aims to give an overview of the state-of-the-art of such systems while predicting their application in cancer drug development. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available