4.7 Review

Polymeric nanohybrids and functionalized carbon nanotubes as drug delivery carriers for cancer therapy

Journal

ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS
Volume 63, Issue 14-15, Pages 1340-1351

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2011.06.013

Keywords

Nanohybrids; Polymeric nanoparticles; Carbon nanotubes; Drug delivery; Microcapsule; Cancer therapy

Funding

  1. Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR)
  2. McGill Majors scholarship
  3. McGill Provost's Graduate Fellowship
  4. BMP Innovation-NSERC
  5. FQRNT
  6. Micropharma Limited
  7. McGill Internal scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The scope of nanotechnology to develop target specific carriers to achieve higher therapeutic efficacy is gaining importance in the pharmaceutical and other industries. Specifically, the emergence of nanohybrid materials is posed to edge over chemotherapy and radiation therapy as cancer therapeutics. This is primarily because nanohybrid materials engage controlled production parameters in the making of engineered particles with specific size, shape, and other essential properties. It is widely expressed that these materials will significantly contribute to the next generation of medical care technology and pharmaceuticals in areas of disease diagnosis, disease prevention and many other treatment procedures. This review focuses on the currently used nanohybrid materials, polymeric nanoparticles and nanotubes, which show great potential as effective drug delivery systems for cancer therapy, as they can be grafted with cell-specific receptors and intracellular targeting molecules for the targeted delivery of therapeutics. Specifically, this article focuses on the current status, recent advancements, potentials and limitations of polymeric nanohybrids and functionalized carbon nanotubes as drug delivery carriers. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available