4.5 Article

Improved methods to identify stable, highly heritable subtypes of opioid use and related behaviors

Journal

ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS
Volume 37, Issue 10, Pages 1138-1144

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.05.010

Keywords

Opioid dependence; Subtypes; Phenotype; k-medoids clustering; Hierarchical clustering; Heritability

Funding

  1. Eisai Pharmaceuticals
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals
  3. ACTIVE
  4. NIH [DA12849, DA12690, DA22288, DA15105, DA005186, AA03510, AA11330, AA13736, GM08607]
  5. VA CT and Philadelphia VA Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Centers (MIRECCs)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although there is evidence that opioid dependence (OD) is heritable, efforts to identify genes contributing to risk for the disorder have been hampered by its complex etiology and variable clinical manifestations. Decomposition of a complex set of opioid users into homogeneous subgroups could enhance genetic analysis. We applied a series of data mining techniques, including multiple correspondence analysis, variable selection and cluster analysis, to 69 opioid-related measures from 5390 subjects aggregated from family-based and case-control genetic studies to identify homogeneous subtypes and estimate their heritability. Novel aspects of this work include our use of 1) heritability estimates of specific clinical features of OD to enhance the heritability of the subtypes and 2) a k-medoids clustering method in combination with hierarchical clustering to yield replicable clusters that are less sensitive to noise than previous methods. We identified five homogeneous groups, including two large groups comprised of 762 and 1353 heavy opioid users, with estimated heritability of 0.69 and 0.76, respectively. These methods represent a promising approach to the identification of highly heritable subtypes in complex, heterogeneous disorders. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available