4.6 Article

Tests of the effects of adolescent early alcohol exposures on adult outcomes

Journal

ADDICTION
Volume 110, Issue 2, Pages 269-278

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/add.12747

Keywords

Adolescence; alcohol; causality; co-twin control; longitudinal; propensity score; twins

Funding

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [R37 AA009367, R01 AA009367] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA005147, R01 DA013240, R37 DA005147] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimsTo determine whether early adolescent alcohol use contributes to adult alcohol use, misuse and other adult substance-related and social outcomes. DesignIn a longitudinal study of twins assessed at target ages 11, 14 and 24 years, two techniques adjusted for confounding factors: a propensity score (PS) adjusting for the effects of measured background covariates and co-twin control (CTC) adjusting for confounding by unmeasured (including genetic) factors shared within early alcohol exposure-discordant pairs. SettingThe community-based Minnesota Twin Family Study. ParticipantsA total of 1512 (50.3% female) twins. MeasurementsEarly adolescent alcohol exposures, adult substance-related and social outcomes and background variables reflecting behavioral, familial and environmental characteristics. FindingsBackground covariates unbalanced between those with and without early alcohol exposure were balanced through PS-based weighting, leaving several adult outcomes related to substance use or social functioning remaining significantly associated with early alcohol exposure. Similarly, the within-pair individual-level component of a CTC indicated that early alcohol-exposed twins had higher risk than their non-exposed co-twins for several, but not all, of the same adult outcomes. For example, early alcohol use was associated with an adult index of alcohol use in both PS-weighted (=0.57, P<0.001) and CTC (=0.21, P=0.031) analyses. ConclusionsEarly alcohol exposures predict adult alcohol problems and related outcomes, despite stringent adjustment for measured and non-measured sources of potential confounding using propensity score and co-twin control. Contrasting the methods indicated that exposure effect estimates from PS application were likely biased by unmeasured confounding factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available