4.6 Article

Beyond drug use: a systematic consideration of other outcomes in evaluations of treatments for substance use disorders

Journal

ADDICTION
Volume 107, Issue 4, Pages 709-718

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03581.x

Keywords

Addiction treatment; clinical outcomes; measures; recommendations

Funding

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse [K24 DA019855-06, R01 DA018652]
  2. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism [K05 AA014223]
  3. National Cancer Institute [R01 CA120412]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Across the addictions field, the primary outcome in treatment research has been reduction in drug consumption. A comprehensive view of the impact of substance use disorders on human functioning suggests that effective treatments should address the many consequences and features of addiction beyond drug use, a recommendation forwarded by multiple expert panels and review papers. Despite recurring proposals, and a compelling general rationale for moving beyond drug use as the sole standard for evaluating addiction treatment, the field has yet to adopt any core set of other measures that are routinely incorporated into treatment research. Among the many reasons for the limited impact of previous proposals has been the absence of a clear set of guidelines for selecting candidate outcomes. This paper is the result of the deliberations of a panel of substance abuse treatment and research experts convened by the National Institute on Drug Abuse to discuss appropriate outcome measures for clinical trials of substance abuse treatments. This paper provides an overview of previous recommendations and outlines specific guidelines for consideration of candidate outcomes. A list of outcomes meeting those guidelines is described and illustrated in detail with two outcomes: craving and quality of life. The paper concludes with specific recommendations for moving beyond the outcome listing offered in this paper to promote the programmatic incorporation of these outcomes into treatment research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available