4.6 Article

The relationship between serious injury and blood alcohol concentration (BAC) in fatal motor vehicle accidents: BAC=0.01% is associated with significantly more dangerous accidents than BAC=0.00%

Journal

ADDICTION
Volume 106, Issue 9, Pages 1614-1622

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03472.x

Keywords

Accidents; alcohol; automotive accidents; blood alcohol concentration (BAC); buzzed driving; cars; drunk driving; fatalities; injuries; seatbelts; speed; United States

Funding

  1. Marian E. Smith Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim To analyze the severity of automotive injuries associated with blood alcohol concentration (BAC) in increments of 0.01%. Design/setting Epidemiological study using the Fatality Analysis Reporting System. Participants All people in US fatal automotive accidents, 1994-2008 (n = 1 495 667). Measurements The ratio of serious: non-serious injuries for drivers, by BAC. Findings Accident severity increases significantly even when the driver is merely 'buzzed', a finding that persists after standardization for various confounding factors. Three mechanisms mediate between buzzed driving and high accident severity: compared to sober drivers, buzzed drivers are significantly more likely to speed, to be improperly seatbelted and to drive the striking vehicle. In addition, there is a strong 'dose-response' relationship for all three factors in relation to accident severity (e. g. the greater the BAC, the greater the average speed of the driver and the greater the severity of the accident). Conclusions The severity of life-threatening motor vehicle accidents increases significantly at blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) far lower than the current US limit of 0.08%. Lowering the legal limit could save lives, prevent serious injuries and reduce financial and social costs associated with motor vehicle accidents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available