4.5 Article

Reactive routing for mobile cognitive radio ad hoc networks

Journal

AD HOC NETWORKS
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages 803-815

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2011.04.004

Keywords

Cognitive radio networks; Ad hoc networks; Mobility; Routing protocol; Reactive; Spectrum aware

Funding

  1. Italian National Project Global & Reliable End to End e-Commerce & On Line Service Platform (GRECO)
  2. project LATINO: Un sistema per la LocAlizzazione ed il Tracciamento di lNdividui al fine di Ottimizzare percorsi in ambienti indoor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although more than a decade has passed from the proposal of the Cognitive Radio paradigm, in these years the research has mainly focused on physical and medium access issues, and few recent works focused on the problem of routing in cognitive networks. This paper addresses such a problem by evaluating the feasibility of reactive routing for mobile cognitive radio ad hoc networks. More specifically, we design a reactive routing protocol for the considered scenario able to achieve three goals: (i) to avoid interferences to primary users during both route formation and data forwarding; (ii) to perform a joint path and channel selection at each forwarder; (iii) to take advantage of the availability of multiple channels to improve the overall performance. Two different versions of the same protocol, referred to as Cognitive Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector (CAODV), are presented. The first version exploits inter-route spectrum diversity, while the second one exploits intra-route spectrum diversity. An exhaustive performance analysis of both the versions of the proposed protocol in different environments and network conditions has been carried out via numerical simulations. The results state the suitability of the proposed protocol for small mobile cognitive radio ad hoc networks. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available