4.1 Article

Gonad morphology and reproductive cycle of the mangrove oyster Crassostrea brasiliana (Lamarck, 1819) in the baia de Guaratuba, Parana, Brazil

Journal

ACTA ZOOLOGICA
Volume 96, Issue 1, Pages 99-107

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/azo.12055

Keywords

reproduction; bivalve mollusc; histology

Funding

  1. Petrobras Development and Citizenship program (PetroleoBrasileiro S/A)
  2. Boticario Group Foundation for Nature Protection (FundacaoGrupoBoticario de Protecao a Natureza)
  3. HSBC Solidarity Institute (Instituto HSBC Solidariedade)
  4. Brazilian National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development (ConselhoNacional de DesenvolvimentoCientifico e Tecnologico - CNPq)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to describe the gonadal histology and the reproductive cycle of Crassostxea brasiliana in the mangroves of Guaratuba Bay in southern Brazil. Adults were collected monthly from January 2010 to April 2011 from three sampling sites in intertidal oyster beds. The animals were evaluated using bionictric and histological analyses of the gonads. The gonadal tissue samples were processed according to the standard histological procedures, and permanent slides were prepared using Harris' haematoxylin and eosin. The oysters were identified at the species level using a molecular protocol. Females (69%) predominated over males (26%), with 4% indeterminate and 1% hermaphroditic. Mature females were more prevalent in February, March and December 2010 and in March 2011. Mature males were more prevalent in February and April 2010 and in March 2011. The presence of hermaphroditic individuals was sporadic, and oysters in immature stages or sexual repose were observed in only a few collections between the months of May and October 2010. The reproduction of C. brasiliana in Guaratuba Bay occurs intermittently, but with greater intensity during the summer, with a larger number of females produced,

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available