3.9 Article

EFFECTS OF THE PLATELET RICH PLASMA ON APEXOGENESIS IN YOUNG MONKEYS: RADIOLOGICAL AND HYSTOLOGYCAL EVALUATION

Journal

ACTA VETERINARIA-BEOGRAD
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages 39-52

Publisher

VETERINARY FACULTY, UNIV BEOGRADU
DOI: 10.2298/AVB1201039P

Keywords

apexogenesis; growth factors; hydroxyapatite; platelet rich plasma; PRP; regeneration

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia [41008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Platelet-reach plasma (PRP) is an attractive tool in regenerative medicine due to its ability to stimulate proliferation and differentiation of stem cells. Since dental pulp derived stem cells are recognized as central in apexogenesis, the aim of the study was to evaluate radiologically and histologically effects of PRP on apexogenesis in teeth with immature roots. The study included eight monkeys (Cercopithecus Aethiops) divided in two equal groups for evaluation 3 and 12 months after treatment. All participants obtained the same treatment including pulpotomy and after-treatment with: hydroxiapatite (HA)-incisor and HA+canine PRP Radiological evaluation was performed using the long cone paralleling technique for recording of defined parameters and histological evaluation was performed using tissue removed en block for the observation of parameters related to apexogenesis. The results obtained radiologically and histologically have shown increase in bridge formation in HA+PRP (75%) group after 3 months comparing to HA group (50%). Contrary to that, after 12 months there were no significant differences between groups. The root delay was not registered in the HA+PRP group contrary to HA group where it was registered in 25% after 12 months. Results of the study suggest that PRP is a powerful tool for intensive and rapid apexogenesis since it offers clear and comprehensive results (mostly in the first three months) which are early radiologically visible without any failure in the proposed requests.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available