4.5 Article

Morphological and phylogenetic analyses of Lutzomyia migonei from three Brazilian states

Journal

ACTA TROPICA
Volume 187, Issue -, Pages 144-150

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.07.027

Keywords

Migonemyia; Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene; Genetic variability

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) [1520/2011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lutzomyia migonei is incriminated as a vector of Leishmania braziliensis, the main causative agent of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Brazil. Recently, this phlebotomine sand fly species has been suggested as a vector for Leishmania infantum, which causes zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis. Considering the widespread distribution of Lu. migonei in South America, the existence of isolated populations has been hypothesized. Three Lu. migonei populations, two from north-eastern Brazil (Machados, Pernambuco State, and Baturite, Ceara State) and other from the south-eastern region (Niteroi, Rio de Janeiro State) were analysed both morphologically and genetically. Though no significant morphological differences were found amongst the sand fly specimens analysed, discriminant analysis based on specific morphometric characters (i.e., length of wing, antennal segment 3 and coxite for males, and length of wing and antennal segment 3 for females), showed that specimens from Machados were closer to Baturite than to NiterOi. The molecular analysis of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene sequences also supported this observation by the distinct separation of two monophyletic clades, grouping specimens from Machados and Baturite separately from those of Niteroi. Our results suggest the existence of different populations within the distribution range of Lu. migonei. Whether these populations are reproductively isolated and/or present differences in terms of vector competence/capacity for L. braziliensis and L. infantum needs to be further investigated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available