4.5 Article

C-reactive protein, early life stress, and wellbeing in healthy adults

Journal

ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA
Volume 126, Issue 6, Pages 402-410

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2012.01892.x

Keywords

C-reactive protein/analysis; mental health; health status; stress; psychological/immunity; health surveys

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [5R01MH068767-08]
  2. National Institutes of Mental Health
  3. NARSAD
  4. UCB Pharma
  5. Sepracor
  6. Cyberonics
  7. Department of Defense
  8. Medtronic
  9. Neuronetics
  10. NeoSync
  11. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [R25 GM083270]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine whether C-reactive protein (CRP) can serve as a marker for alterations in immune function prior to the manifestation of significant psychiatric and medical disorders. Method: Ninety-two healthy adults were recruited from the community and determined to be free of psychiatric or medical disorders. The concentration of plasma CRP from a single resting sample was examined in relation to current mental and physical health as well as to self-reported history of early life adversity. Results: C-reactive protein showed a significant positive correlation with body mass index (BMI; r = 0.477, P < 0.001). Non-specific pain, fatigue, and lower overall quality of physical health were all associated with higher CRP concentrations (all P < 0.05 or P < 0.01), after controlling for effect of BMI and other relevant covariates. Subthreshold depression symptoms and other indices of mental/emotional wellbeing were not associated with CRP, nor was CRP significantly linked to any measures of early life adversity. Conclusion: Lower-quality physical health and wellbeing, but not the presence of mood/anxiety symptoms or early life stress (ELS), were significantly related to plasma CRP. Elevated CRP does not appear to be a fundamental consequence of ELS among healthy adults.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available