4.5 Article

Experience sampling research in individuals with mental illness: reflections and guidance

Journal

ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA
Volume 123, Issue 1, Pages 12-20

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2010.01596.x

Keywords

experience sampling; research methods; Ecological Momentary Assessment

Categories

Funding

  1. NARSAD Young Investigator Award
  2. P1vital a Precompetitive Consortium
  3. MRC [G0300610] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G0300610] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The experience sampling method (ESM) represents a valuable way of assessing clinical phenomena in real world settings and across time. Despite its theoretical advantages, using this methodology in psychiatric populations is challenging. This paper acts as a guide to researchers wishing to employ this approach when investigating mental illness. Method: The contents represent the opinions of researchers around the United Kingdom and the Netherlands who are experienced at using the ESM. Results: In ESM studies, participants are required to fill in questions about their current thoughts, feelings and experiences when prompted by an electronic device (e.g. a wristwatch, PDA). Entries are typically made at fixed or random intervals over 6 days. This article outlines how to design and validate an ESM diary. We then discuss which sampling procedure to use and how to increase compliance through effective briefing and telephone sessions. Debriefing, data management and analytical issues are considered, before suggestions for future clinical uses of the ESM are made. Conclusion: The last decade has seen an increase in the number of studies employing the ESM in clinical research. Further research is needed to examine the optimal equipment and procedure for different clinical groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available