4.6 Article

Impact of respiratory pattern on lung mechanics and interstitial proteoglycans in spontaneously breathing anaesthetized healthy rats

Journal

ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA
Volume 203, Issue 2, Pages 331-341

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2011.02317.x

Keywords

lung glycosaminoglycans; lung proteoglycans; pulmonary extracellular matrix; respiratory mechanics

Categories

Funding

  1. European Society of Anesthesiology (ESA)
  2. University of Insubria [FAR 2008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different pattern of spontaneous breathing on the respiratory mechanics and on the integrity of the pulmonary extracellular matrix. Methods: Experiments were performed on adult healthy rats in which different spontaneously breathing pattern was elicited through administration of two commonly used anaesthetic mixtures: pentobarbital/urethane (P/U) and ketamine/medetomidine (K/M). The animals (five per group) were randomized and left to spontaneously breath for 10 min (P/U-sham; K/M-sham) or for 4 h (P/U-4 h; K/M-4 h), targeting the anaesthesia level to obtain a tidal volume of about 8 mL kg(-1) body wt. At the end of the experiment, lung matrix integrity was assessed through determination of the glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) content in the lung parenchyma. Results: Compared with K/M, anaesthesia with P/U cocktail induced: (1) a higher respiratory rate and minute ventilation attained with lower PaCO2; (2) a higher pressure-time-product and work of breathing per minute; (3) a lower static lung compliance; (4) an increased activation of lung tissue metalloproteases; and (5) greater extraction of pulmonary interstitial GAGs. Conclusions: This study suggests that the breathing pattern induced by the different anaesthetic regimen may damage the pulmonary interstitium even during spontaneous breathing at physiological tidal volumes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available