4.5 Article

Cloning and expression of genes related to the sucrose-metabolizing enzymes and carbohydrate changes in peach

Journal

ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 589-602

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11738-012-1100-1

Keywords

Peach; Sucrose; Carbohydrate; Sucrose-metabolizing enzyme; Cloning; Gene expression

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [30871681]
  2. Postdoctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Jiangsu Province [1002024B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To shed light on the relationship between sucrose metabolism and expression of genes related to sucrose-metabolizing enzymes, six genes encoding sucrose-metabolizing enzymes were isolated, and the levels of four main carbohydrates and related enzyme activities as well as the expression of these six genes were determined in fruits, leaves and phloem-enriched fraction throughout peach fruit development. Sucrose content in mature fruit ranked first followed by glucose, fructose and sorbitol in that order, while sorbitol was the highest and sucrose lowest in phloem-enriched fraction and leaves. Glucose and fructose had similar change patterns throughout fruit development. Cloning results reveal that the nucleotide sequences of the six genes have high similarity to corresponding genes isolated from other plants. In addition, the expression of these genes and the levels of related enzyme activities varied with tissue and stage of fruit development, suggesting a complexity in relationships between carbohydrates, enzymes activities and related gene expression. Sucrose phosphate synthase maybe a key enzyme involved in sucrose synthesis while sucrose synthase may mainly be responsible for sucrose synthesis in peach fruits at later stages of development. Further studies are needed to genetically and physiologically characterize these genes and enzymes in peach and to gain a better understanding of their functions and relationship with carbohydrate metabolism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available