4.5 Article

Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated genetic transformation of selected elite clone(s) of Eucalyptus tereticornis

Journal

ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages 1603-1611

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11738-010-0695-3

Keywords

Acetosyringone; Co-cultivation; Plantation forestry; 16S rRNA; GUS expression

Categories

Funding

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Govt. of India, New Delhi [38(1158)/07/EMR-II]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Procedure for the Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated T-DNA delivery into the elite clone(s) of Eucalyptus tereticornis using leaf explants from microshoots has been developed. Amongst two strains of A. tumefaciens namely, EHA105 and LBA4404 (harbouring pBI121 plasmid), strain EHA105 was found to be more efficient. Pre-culturing of tissue (2 days) on medium supplemented with 100 mu M acetosyringone, before bacterial infection significantly increased transient expression of reporter gene (GUS). Co-cultivation period of 2 days and a bacterial density of 0.8 OD600 resulted in higher transient GUS expression. Method of injury to tissue, presence of acetosyringone in co-cultivation medium and photoperiod during co-cultivation also influenced the expression of transient GUS activity. Amongst the three clones tested, maximum transient GUS activity was recorded in clone 'CE2' followed by clone 'T1'. Regeneration of transformed shoots was achieved on modified Murashige and Skoog medium (potassium nitrate was replaced with 990 mg/l potassium sulphate and ammonium nitrate with 392 mg/l ammonium sulphate, and mesoinositol concentration was increased to 200 mg/l). Stable transformation was confirmed on the basis of GUS activity and PCR amplification of DNA fragments specific to uidA and nptII genes. The absence of bacteria in the stable transformed tissues was confirmed by PCR amplification of fragment specific to 16S rRNA of bacteria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available