4.7 Article

Combination of fluvastatin and losartan relieves atherosclerosis and macrophage infiltration in atherosclerotic plaques in rabbits

Journal

ACTA PHARMACOLOGICA SINICA
Volume 32, Issue 10, Pages 1259-1265

Publisher

ACTA PHARMACOLOGICA SINICA
DOI: 10.1038/aps.2011.95

Keywords

losartan; fluvastatin; cholesterol; atherosclerosis; macrophages; monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1); inflammation; p38 MAPK; smooth muscle cells

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81170207]
  2. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [B07035]
  3. Shandong Natural Science Foundation of China [03BS37, Y2006C68]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: To investigate whether the combination of fluvastatin and losartan synergistically relieve atherosclerosis and plaque inflammation induced by a high-cholesterol diet in rabbits. Methods: Atherosclerosis was induced with a high-cholesterol diet for 3 months in 36 New Zealand white rabbits. The animals were randomly divided into model group, fluvastatin (10 mg.kg(-1).d(-1)) group, losartan (25 mg.kg(-1).d(-1)) group, and fluvastatin plus losartan group. After the 16-week treatments, the blood samples the animals were collected, and the thoracic aortas were examined immunohistochemically. The mRNA and protein expression levels of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) were measured using RT-PCR and Western blot. Results: Compared to the treatment with losartan or fluvastatin alone, the combined treatment did not produce higher efficacy in reduction of blood cholesterol level. However, the combination did synergistically decrease the intimal and media thickness of thoracic aortas with significantly reduced macrophage infiltration and MCP-1 expression in the plaques. Conclusion: The combined treatment with losartan and fluvastatin significantly inhibited atherosclerotic progress and reduced inflammation associated with atherosclerotic plaques.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available