4.7 Article

Highly Conductive Li Garnets by a Multielement Doping Strategy

Journal

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 54, Issue 7, Pages 3600-3607

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b00184

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) under the Robust Affordable Next Generation Energy Storage Systems (RANGE) program [DE-AR0000384]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Highly conductive Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZ) garnet-type solid electrolytes were further optimized to improve Li-ion conduction by La3+-sites substitution with Ba2+ and Zr4+-sites substitution with Ta5+ and Nb5+. Garnet-structured metal oxides of the nominal chemical compositions Li6.65La2.75Ba0.25Zr1.4Ta0.5Nb0.1O12, Li6.4La3Zr1.4Ta0.6-xNbxO12 (x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3), and the parent LLZ, as a reference, were prepared via conventional solid-state reaction to investigate the effect of multielement doping on ionic conductivity. The phase formation, morphology, and Li ion conductivity were characterized using powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), scanning electron microscopy, and alternating current impedance spectroscopy methods, respectively. In addition, solid-state Al-27 and Li-7 magic-angle spinning (MAS) NMR was used to study the effect of Al doping on the investigated multielement doped Li-stuffed garnet metal oxides. All the prepared samples obtained the cubic garnet-type structure (space group: Ia (3) over bard; No. 230) at 1150 degrees C, similar to that of cubic LLZ. Except for Li6.4La3Zr1.4Ta0.6O12, all the members show Al content by Al MAS NMR. However, it was not possible to detect Al-based impurity phases using PXRD in any of the investigated garnets. Among the samples investigated in this work, Al-free Li6.4La3Zr1.4Ta0.6O12 demonstrated a bulk Li ion conductivity of 0.72 mS cm(-1) at 25 degrees C, with apparent activation energy of 0.26 eV, significantly higher than the parent LLZ.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available