4.5 Article

Very preterm birth and foetal growth restriction are associated with specific cognitive deficits in children attending mainstream school

Journal

ACTA PAEDIATRICA
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages 84-90

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apa.12811

Keywords

Developmental outcome; Intrauterine growth restriction; Neurocognitive impairment; Small for gestational age; Very premature infant

Categories

Funding

  1. National Graduate School of Clinical Investigation
  2. Foundation for Pediatric Research
  3. Sigrid Juselius Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: This study investigated the association of prenatal and neonatal factors with cognitive outcomes in schoolchildren born very preterm without impairments at the age of nine. Methods: We recruited a prospective regional cohort of 154 very low gestational age (VLGA) children of <32 weeks and 90 term-born comparison children born between November 1998 and November 2002 at Oulu University Hospital, Finland. Cognitive outcome was assessed using an inclusive neuropsychological test repertoire at the age of nine. Results: The final study group comprised 77 VLGA children without cerebral palsy or any cognitive impairment and 27 term-born children. VLGA was associated with a 1.5-point [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.6-2.3] reduction in visuospatial-sensorimotor processing and a 1.2-point (95% CI 0.5-1.9) reduction in attention-executive functions scores. Foetal growth restriction (FGR) was the only clinical risk factor that was associated with cognitive outcome. Children with FGR had a significant decrease in language (1.7 points, 95% CI 0.50-3.0) and memory-learning (1.6 points, 95% CI 0.4-2.8) scores. Conclusion: Children born very preterm without impairments had poorer performance in specific neurocognitive skills than term-born children. FGR was an independent risk factor for compromised neurocognitive outcome in VLGA children and predicted difficulties in language, memory and learning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available