4.5 Article

Questionable sound exposure outside of the womb: frequency analysis of environmental noise in the neonatal intensive care unit

Journal

ACTA PAEDIATRICA
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages E14-E19

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apa.12816

Keywords

Environment; Frequency; NICU; Noise; Preterm infants

Categories

Funding

  1. Charles H. Hood Foundation
  2. Peter and Elizabeth C. Tower Foundation
  3. Gerber Foundation
  4. Little Giraffe Foundation
  5. Nexxspan Healthcare

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: Recent research raises concerns about the adverse effects of noise exposure on the developing preterm infant. However, current guidelines for NICU noise remain focused on loudness levels, leaving the problem of exposure to potentially harmful sound frequencies largely overlooked. This study examined the frequency spectra present in a level-II NICU. Methods: Noise measurements were taken in two level-II open-bay nurseries. Measurements were taken over 5 days for a period of 24 h each. Spectral analysis was focused on comparing sound frequencies in the range of human speech during daytime (7 AM-7 PM) vs. night-time (7 PM-7 AM). Results: On average, daytime noise levels (L-eq = 60.05 dBA) were higher than night-time (L-eq = 58.67 dBA). Spectral analysis of frequency bands (>50 dB) revealed that infants were exposed to frequencies <500 Hz 100% of the time and to frequencies >500 Hz 57% of the time. During daytime, infants were exposed to nearly 20% more sounds within the speech frequency range compared with night-time (p = 0.018). Conclusion: Measuring the frequency spectra of NICU sounds is necessary to attain a thorough understanding of both the noise levels and the type of sounds that preterm infants are exposed to throughout their hospital stay. The risk of high-frequency noise exposure in the preterm population is still unclear and warrants further investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available