4.5 Article

Prenatal paracetamol exposure and risk of wheeze at preschool age

Journal

ACTA PAEDIATRICA
Volume 100, Issue 12, Pages 1567-1571

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02403.x

Keywords

Asthma; Paracetamol; Prenatal; Preschool children; Wheezing phenotypes

Categories

Funding

  1. Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg
  2. Research Foundation of the Swedish Asthma and Allergy Association
  3. Swedish Foundation for Health Care Sciences and Allergy Research
  4. Health & Medical Care Committee of the Regional Executive Board, Vastra Gotaland Region

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: To analyse the association between prenatal paracetamol exposure and preschool wheeze. Methods: Data were obtained from a prospective, longitudinal study of a cohort of children born in the region of western Sweden in 2003; 8176 families were randomly selected. The parents answered questionnaires at 6 and 12 months and at 4.5 years of age. The response rate was 55%, i.e. 4496 of the 5398 questionnaires distributed at 4.5 years (83%). Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treated wheeze during the last year was regarded as a proxy for doctor-diagnosed asthma. Episodic viral wheeze was defined as wheezing only with viral infections and multiple-trigger wheeze as wheezing also in between infections. Results: In the multivariate analysis, the risk of ICS-treated wheeze was increased by paracetamol (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.01-2.6). Within the ICS-treated group, the effect was significant for multiple-trigger wheeze (OR 2.4; 1.2-4.8) but not for episodic viral wheeze (OR 1.1; 0.5-2.3). Conclusion: Prenatal paracetamol exposure was an independent risk factor for ICS-treated wheeze at preschool age, especially among children with ICS-treated multiple-trigger wheeze. Although the analysis adjusted for e. g. maternal asthma and antibiotic use, the possibility of residual confounding by maternal indication (respiratory illness) should be acknowledged.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available