4.5 Article

Validating the waist-height ratio and developing centiles for use amongst children and adolescents

Journal

ACTA PAEDIATRICA
Volume 98, Issue 1, Pages 148-152

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.01050.x

Keywords

Body mass index; Cardiovascular co-morbidities; Childhood obesity; Validation; Waist-height ratio

Categories

Funding

  1. Queensland Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: To assess the statistical validity of the waist-height ratio (WHtR) as an appropriate method of adjusting waist circumference (WC) for height in children and adolescents. Introduction: Recently, WHtR has been proposed to be of greater value than body mass index (BMI), in predicting obesity-related cardiovascular co-morbidities in children. This index, however, is yet to be extensively validated within the paediatric population. Methods: Height and WC in centimetres, were measured in 3597 children from grades 1 (5-7 years), 5 (9-11 years) and 10 (15-17 years). Log regression analyses using WC and height were performed to determine appropriate powers (p) to raise height, to completely adjust the index for height, by sex and grade. Correlations between WHtR and height were assessed. Results: Statistically, the WHtR is only valid for use among grade 1 boys and girls (p = 1.09 [95%CI 0.95-1.23] and p = 1.07 [95%CI 0.92-1.22], respectively) and grade 10 girls p = 0.85 (95%CI 0.62-1.08). However, the error (0.25%-1.85%), associated with the use of this index, in all ages and both sexes is clinically and biologically acceptable. Conclusion: The WHtR is a clinically and biologically valid index to use among Australian children and adolescents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available