4.1 Article

Novel additive manufactured scaffolds for tissue engineered trachea research

Journal

ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA
Volume 133, Issue 4, Pages 412-417

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2012.761725

Keywords

Airway; additive manufacturing; rapid prototyping; artificial; cell culture; surgery; reconstruction

Funding

  1. Tekes FiDiPro Programme [40041/10]
  2. Helsinki University Central Hospital Research Funds
  3. Mehilaisen Tutkimussaatio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conclusions: This study demonstrates proof of concept for controlled manufacturing methods that utilize novel tailored biopolymers (3D photocuring technology) or conventional bioresorbable polymers (fused deposition modeling, FDM) for macroscopic and microscopic geometry control. The manufactured scaffolds could be suitable for tissue engineering research. Objectives: To design novel trachea scaffold prototypes for tissue engineering purposes, and to fabricate them by additive manufacturing. Methods: A commercial 3D model and CT scans of a middle-aged man were obtained for geometrical observations and measurements of human trachea. Model trachea scaffolds with variable wall thickness, interconnected pores, and various degrees of porosity were designed. Photocurable polycaprolactone (PCL) polymer was used with 3D photocuring technology. Thermoplastic polylactide (PLA) and PCL were used with FDM. Cell cultivations were performed for biocompatibility studies. Results: Scaffolds of various sizes and porosities were successfully produced. Both thermoplastic PLA and PCL and photocurable PCL could be used effectively with additive manufacturing technologies to print high-quality tubular porous biodegradable structures. Optical microscopic and SEM images showed the viability of cells. The cells were growing in multiple layers, and biocompatibility of the structures was shown.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available