Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Outcome Instruments: Rationale for Their Use
Rudolf W. Poolman et al.
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME (2009)
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
David Moher et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)
Validation of the Dutch version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
I. B. de Groot et al.
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE (2009)
Responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score and the SF-36: five years after total hip arthroplasty
Hon-Yi Shi et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2009)
Effect sizes can be calculated for studies reporting ranges for outcome variables in systematic reviews
S. D. Walter et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2007)
Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires
Caroline B. Terwee et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2007)
The reliability of hip scoring systems for total hip arthroplasty candidates: assessment by physical therapists
L Kirmit et al.
CLINICAL REHABILITATION (2005)
The Oxford Heup Score - The translation and validation of a questionnaire into Dutch to evaluate the results of total hip arthroplasty
T Gosens et al.
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA (2005)
Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement - A comparison of five instruments of health status
M Ostendorf et al.
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME (2004)
Satisfactory cross cultural equivalence of the Dutch WOMAC in patients with hip osteoarthritis waiting for arthroplasty
LD Roorda et al.
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES (2004)
Share Paper
