4.3 Article

Polymorphisms in TLR9 but not in TLR5 increase the risk for duodenal ulcer and alter cytokine expression in the gastric mucosa

Journal

INNATE IMMUNITY
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages 706-713

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1753425915587130

Keywords

Duodenal ulcer; gastric cancer; Helicobacter pylori; single-nucleotide polymorphisms; Toll-like receptor 9

Funding

  1. CONACYT-FOSISS, MEXICO [SALUD-2007-01-69450]
  2. Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnologia del Distrito Federal [ICYTDF/234/2012, PICSA 12-209]
  3. Fundacion IMSS, Mexico

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Colonization of the gastric mucosa by Helicobacter pylori can lead to peptic ulcer and gastric adenocarcinoma. TLRs are signaling receptors involved in the recognition of microorganisms, and polymorphisms in their genes may influence the innate and adaptive immune response to H. pylori, affecting the clinical outcomes of the infection. We assessed the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms in TLR9 and TLR5 and gastroduodenal diseases. All patients were genotyped by allelic discrimination in regions 1174C>T and 1775A>G of TLR5 and -1237T>C and 2848G>A of TLR9. The 2848A allele of TLR9 was more frequent in duodenal ulcer and showed an association of risk with this pathology. Polymorphisms in TLR5 were not found to be associated with disease. Patients with polymorphisms in TLR9 and TLR5 expressed significantly lower levels of IL-1 and TNF-, whereas polymorphisms in TLR5 also decreased the expression of IL-6 and IL-10. Our findings suggest that 2848G>A polymorphism in TLR9 increases the risk for the development of duodenal ulcer probably by modifying the inflammatory response to H. pylori infection. This is the first study to show an association of 2848A allele of TLR9 with duodenal ulcer and with altered expression of inflammatory cytokines in the gastric mucosa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available