4.4 Article

DNA damage in lens epithelium of cataract patients in vivo and ex vivo

Journal

ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages 652-656

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02500.x

Keywords

8-oxoguanine; cataract; comet assay; DNA damage; human lens epithelium; lens; light; oxidative stress; oxidized purines

Categories

Funding

  1. Norwegian Association of the Blind and Partially sighted
  2. Blindemissionen IL
  3. University of Oslo
  4. Oslo University hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

. Purpose: DNA damage has been described in the human cataractous lens epithelium, and oxidative stress generated by UV radiation and endogenous metabolic processes has been suggested to play a significant role in the pathogenesis of cataract. In this study, the aim was to explore the quality and relative quantity of DNA damage in lens epithelium of cataract patients in vivo and after incubation in a cell culture system. Methods: Capsulotomy specimens were analysed, before and after 1week of ex vivo cultivation, using the comet assay to measure DNA strand breaks, oxidized purine and pyrimidine bases and UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers. Results: DNA strand breaks were barely detectable, oxidized pyrimidines and pyrimidine dimers were present at low levels, whereas there was a relatively high level of oxidized purines, which further increased after cultivation. Conclusion: The observed levels of oxidized purines in cataractous lens epithelium may support a theory consistent with light damage and oxidative stress as mediators of molecular damage to the human lens epithelium. Damage commonly associated with UV-B irradiation was relatively low. The levels of oxidized purines increased further in a commonly used culture system. This is of interest considering the importance and versatility of ex vivo systems in studies exploring the pathogenesis of cataract.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available