4.4 Article

Sensitivity and specificity of CT- and MRI-scanning in evaluation of occult fracture of the proximal femur

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.006

Keywords

Occult hip fracture; Occult fracture proximal femur; Sensitivity; Specificity MRI; CT; Interobserver agreement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To estimate sensitivity and specificity of CT and MRI examinations in patients with fractures of the proximal femur. To determine the interobserver agreement of the modalities among a senior consulting radiologist, a resident in radiology and a resident in orthopaedics surgery. Materials and methods: 67 patients (27 males, 40 females, mean age 80.5) seen in the emergency room with hip pain after fall, inability to stand and a primary X-ray without fracture were evaluated with both CT and MRI. The images were analysed by a senior consulting musculoskeletal radiologist, a resident in radiology and a resident in orthopaedic surgery. Sensitivity and specificity were estimated with MRI as the golden standard. Kappa value was used to assess level of agreement in both MRI and CT finding. Results: 15 fractures of the proximal femur were found (7 intertrochanteric-, 3 femoral neck and 5 fractures of the greater trochanter). Two fractures were not identified by CT and four changed fracture location. Among those, three patients underwent surgery. Sensitivity of CT was 0.87; 95% CI [0.60; 0.98]. Kappa for interobserver agreement for CT were 0.46; 95% CI [0.23; 0.76] and 0.67; 95% CI [0.42; 0.90]. For MRI 0.67; 95% CI [0.43; 0.91] and 0.69; 95% CI [0.45; 0.92]. Conclusion: MRI was observed to have a higher diagnostic accuracy than CT in detecting occult fractures of the hip. Interobserver analysis showed high kappa values corresponding substantial agreement in both CT and MRI. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available