4.4 Article

Extended mutation spectrum of Usher syndrome in Finland

Journal

ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA
Volume 91, Issue 4, Pages 325-334

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02397.x

Keywords

CLRN1; Finland; mutation; MYO7A; USH; USH2A; Usher syndrome

Categories

Funding

  1. Finnish Eye and Tissue Bank Foundation
  2. Finnish RP Society
  3. Foundation Fighting Blindness
  4. Hope for Vision
  5. Liv och Halsa rf
  6. Paulo Foundation
  7. Sokeain Ystavat ry
  8. Research Foundation of the University of Helsinki

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The Finnish distribution of clinical Usher syndrome (USH) types is 40% USH3, 34% USH1 and 12% USH2. All patients with USH3 carry the founder mutation in clarin 1 (CLRN1), whereas we recently reported three novel myosin VIIA (MYO7A) mutations in two unrelated patients with USH1. This study was carried out to further investigate the USH mutation spectrum in Finnish patients. Methods: We analysed samples from nine unrelated USH patients/families without known mutations and two USH3 families with atypically severe phenotype. The Asper Ophthalmics USH mutation chip was used to screen for known mutations and to evaluate the chip in molecular diagnostics of Finnish patients. Results: The chip revealed a heterozygous usherin (USH2A) mutation, p.N346H, in one patient. Sequencing of MYO7A and/or USH2A in three index patients revealed two novel heterozygous mutations, p.R873W in MYO7A and c.14343+2T > C in USH2A. We did not identify definite pathogenic second mutations in the patients, but identified several probably nonpathogenic variations that may modify the disease phenotype. Possible digenism could not be excluded in two families segregating genomic variations in both MYO7A and USH2A, and two families with CLRN1 and USH2A. Conclusion: We conclude that there is considerable genetic heterogeneity of USH1 and USH2 in Finland, making molecular diagnostics and genetic counselling of patients and families challenging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available