4.0 Article

Strain differences in antioxidants in rat models of cardiovascular disease exposed to ozone

Journal

INHALATION TOXICOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue -, Pages 54-62

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/08958378.2014.954170

Keywords

Cardiovascular disease models; lung antioxidants; oxidative stress; ozone; rat models

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examined the hypothesis that antioxidant substances and enzymes in lung, heart and in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) are altered in response to O-3 in cardiovascular disease and/or metabolic syndrome (CVD)-prone rat models. CVD strains [spontaneously hypertensive (SH), SH stroke-prone (SHSP), SHHF/Mcc heart failure obese (SHHF), insulin-resistant JCR:LA-cp obese (JCR) and Fawn-Hooded hypertensive (FHH)] were compared with normal strains [Wistar, Sprague-Dawley (SD) and Wistar Kyoto (WKY)]. Total glutathione (GSH+GSSG or GSx), reduced ascorbate (AH2), uric acid (UA) and antioxidant enzymes were determined in lung, heart and BALF immediately (0h) or 20-h post 4-h nose-only exposure to 0.0, 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0ppm O-3. Basal- and O-3-induced antioxidant substances in tissues varied widely among strains. Wistar rats had a robust O-3-induced increase in GSx and AH2 in the lung. Two CVD strains (JCR and SHHF) had high basal levels of AH2 and GSx in BALF as well as high basal lung UA. Across all strains, high BALF GSx was only observed when high BALF AH2 was present. CVD rats tended to respond less to O-3 than normal. High-basal BALF AH2 levels were associated with decreased O-3 toxicity. In summary, large differences were observed between both normal and CVD rat strains in low-molecular weight antioxidant concentrations in lung, BALF and heart tissue. Wistar (normal) and JCR and SHHF (CVD) rats appeared to stand out as peculiar in terms of basal- or O-3-induced changes. Results elucidate interactions among antioxidants and air pollutants that could enhance understanding of cardiopulmonary disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available