4.4 Article

Identification of metabolic biomarkers to diagnose epithelial ovarian cancer using a UPLC/QTOF/MS platform

Journal

ACTA ONCOLOGICA
Volume 51, Issue 4, Pages 473-479

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2011.648338

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 81172767]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Currently available tests are insufficient to distinguish patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) from normal individuals. Metabolomics, a study of metabolic processes in biologic systems, has emerged as a key technology in the measurements of small molecular metabolites in tissues or biofluids. Material and methods. To investigate the application of metabolomics on selecting EOC-associated biomarkers, 173 plasma specimens (80 newly diagnosed EOC patients and 93 normal individuals) were analyzed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC/QTOF/MS). A two-step strategy was performed to select EOC-associated biomarkers. The first step was to select potential biomarkers in distinguishing 42 cancer patients from 58 normal controls through partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and database searching, and the second step was to validate the discrimination performance of these biomarkers in a dataset contained 38 EOCs and 35 controls. Results. Eight candidate biomarkers were selected. The combination of these biomarkers resulted in the area of receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.941, a sensitivity of 0.921, and a specificity of 0.886 at the best cut-off point for detecting EOC. Discussion. Our findings suggested that sharp differences in metabolic profiles exist between EOC patients and normal controls. The identified eight metabolites associated with EOC may be served as novel biomarkers for diagnosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available