4.3 Article

Reindeer grazing has contrasting effect on species traits in Vaccinium vitis-idaea L. and Bistorta vivipara (L.) Gray

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2013.08.006

Keywords

Biomass allocation; Carbon; Grazing; Nitrogen; Stabile isotopes; Tundra

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning [214-2010-1411]
  2. strategic research area BECC (Biodiversity and Ecosystems in a Changing Climate)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

That reindeer grazing can have large effects on plant communities is well known, but how reindeer grazing affects plant traits and plant carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) allocation has not been studied to the same extent. This study was conducted in a sub-arctic dry heath in northern Sweden. 17-year-old reindeer exclosures were used to test whether reindeer grazing affects the C:N ratio (a plant quality index), and the delta C-13 and delta N-15 (indicators of changes in C and N dynamics) as well as the C and N content of above- and below ground parts of the evergreen dwarf shrub Vaccinium vitis-idaea L. and the perennial forb Bistorta vivipara (L) Gray. A lower C:N ratio was found in B. vivipara compared to V. vitis-idaea suggesting a higher grazing pressure on that species. We found that grazing reduced the total C content, by 26%, and increased the delta N-15, by 1 parts per thousand, in the leaves of B. vivipara, while no changes were observed in V. vitis-idaea. Fine roots of B. vivipara had higher delta C-13 (1 parts per thousand) and delta N-15 (2.5 parts per thousand) than the leaves, while such differences were not found in V. vitis-idaea. The results also highlight the importance of analysing both above- and belowground plant parts when interpreting natural variations in delta C-13 and delta N-15. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available