4.3 Article

Domestication and defence: Foliar tannins and C/N ratios in cassava and a close wild relative

Journal

ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages 147-154

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2008.05.009

Keywords

Agricultural environments; Domestication; Leaf construction strategy; Manihot; Resource allocation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plant domestication is accompanied by shifts in resource allocation, as a result of farmer selection for genotypes that give high yields in agricultural habitats. Relaxed natural selection for chemical and physical defences in these habitats could facilitate resource allocation to yield. We compared the concentrations of tannins, and C/N ratios, which are often correlated with investment in cell-wall compounds, in leaves of landraces of domesticated cassava (Manihot esculerita) and a close wild relative in French Guiana. Foliar concentrations of tannins were about 1.9 times higher in the wild relative than in domesticated cassava. Histochernical analyses showed that tannins were present in nearly all palisade and spongy parenchyma cells of the wild taxon, but in only some cells of these tissues in M. esculenta. C/N ratios were also 1.9 times higher in leaves of the wild relative than in those of domesticated cassava. Tannins accounted for only a small proportion of total carbon, and the higher C/N ratio in wild than in domesticated cassava may reflect higher investment in carbon-containing compounds additional to tannins, such as cell-wall compounds. The divergence in these traits between cassava and this close wild relative mirrors a broad pattern observed in wild plant species across habitats varying in resource availability. one explanation for our results is that domestication in cassava may have favoured a shift from a resource conservation strategy to a resource acquisition strategy. (C) 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available