4.5 Article

The cervical mucus plug inhibits, but does not block, the passage of ascending bacteria from the vagina during pregnancy

Journal

ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
Volume 93, Issue 1, Pages 102-108

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12296

Keywords

Cervical mucus plug; 16S rDNA quantitative polymerase chain reaction; Lactobacillus species; antimicrobial properties; intra-amniotic infection

Funding

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, DHHS
  2. Danish Council for Independent Research - Medical Sciences
  3. Augustinus Fonden
  4. Den Bohmske Fond
  5. Margot and John Fribergs Fond
  6. Torben and Alice Frimodts Fond

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveTo evaluate the microbial load and the inflammatory response in the distal and proximal parts of the cervical mucus plug. DesignExperimental research. PopulationTwenty women with a normal, singleton pregnancy. SampleVaginal swabs and specimens from the distal and proximal parts of the cervical mucus plug. MethodsImmunohistochemistry, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, quantitative polymerase chain reaction and histology. ResultsThe total bacterial load (16S rDNA) was significantly lower in the cervical mucus plug compared with the vagina (p=0.001). Among women harboring Ureaplasma parvum, the median genome equivalents/g were 1574 (interquartile range 2526) in the proximal part, 657 (interquartile range 1620) in the distal part and 60240 (interquartile range 96386) in the vagina. Histological examinations and quantitative polymerase chain reaction revealed considerable amounts of lactobacilli and inflammatory cells in both parts of the cervical mucus plug. The matrix metalloproteinase-8 concentration was decreased in the proximal part of the plug compared with the distal part (p=0.08). ConclusionThe cervical mucus plug inhibits, but does not block, the passage of Ureaplasma parvum during its ascending route from the vagina through the cervical canal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available