4.7 Article

Double-quantitative decision-theoretic rough set

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 316, Issue -, Pages 54-67

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2015.04.020

Keywords

Bayesian decision; Decision-theoretic rough set; Double quantification; Graded rough set; Quantitative information

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [61105041, 61472463, 61402064]
  2. Key Laboratory of Intelligent Perception and Systems for High-Dimensional Information (Nanjing University of Science and Technology), Ministry of Education [30920140122006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The probabilistic rough set (PRS) and the graded rough set (GRS) are two quantification models that measure relative and absolute quantitative information between the equivalence class and a basic concept, respectively. As a special PRS model, the decision-theoretic rough set (DTRS) mainly utilizes the conditional probability to express relative quantification. However, it ignores absolute quantitative information of the overlap between equivalence class and the basic set, and it cannot reflect the distinctive degrees of information and extremely narrow their applications in real life. In order to overcome these defects, this paper proposes a framework of double-quantitative decision-theoretic rough set (Dq-DTRS) based on Bayesian decision procedure and GRS. Two kinds of Dq-DTRS model are constructed, which essentially indicate the relative and absolute quantification. After further studies to discuss decision rules and the inner relationship between these two models, we introduce an illustrative case study about the medical diagnosis to interpret and express the theories, which is valuable for applying these theories to deal with practical issues. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available